ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA (BUC)

The International Journal of Romanian Society of Endocrinology / Registered in 1938

in Web of Science Master Journal List

Acta Endocrinologica(Bucharest) is live in PubMed Central

Journal Impact Factor - click here.

Year Volume Issue First page
10.4183/aeb.
Author
Title
Abstract/Title
From through

  • Endocrine Care

    Lichiardopol R, Florentiu A, Radoi V

    Body composition and the metabolic impact of weight excess in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus

    Acta Endo (Buc) 2010 6(4): 493-506 doi: 10.4183/aeb.2010.493

    Abstract
    Background and aims. Increased fat accumulation associated to increased cardiometabolic risk factors is a prominent feature of type 2 diabetes. In type 1 diabetes, increased fat accumulation is not prevalent and its metabolic impact has not been fully evaluated. We aimed to evaluate differences in body composition, clinical and metabolic\r\nprofile in type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients with varying degrees of adiposity.\r\nMaterials and methods. Clinical, biochemical and body composition data (using a bioelectric impedance analyzer) from 96 type 1 and 253 type 2 adult diabetes patients have\r\nbeen collected.\r\nResults. In type 1 patients estimated visceral fat area (eVFA) increased significantly (84.3?27.9 vs. 103.0?27.9 vs. 128.1?29.1 cm2, p=0.006, 0.003, and <0.001) while BMI, body fat mass (BFM) did not differ across age tertiles. Between normal weight (BMI<25 kg/m2) and overweight (BMI>25 kg/m2) type 1 patients there were no significant differences either in triglycerides (128.7?135.6 vs. 92.8?50.6 mg/dl, p=0.1), HDL-cholesterol (53.6?15.9 vs.\r\n52.3?13.7 mg/dl, p=0.6) and uric acid levels (3.4?2.0 vs. 2.9?1.2 mg/dl, p=0.2), or in hypertension (39.5% vs. 40.0%, p=0.7) and nonalcoholic hepatosteatosis (NASH) (10.0% vs.\r\n10.5%, p=0.6) prevalences. In type 2 patients, BMI (32.3?5.9 vs. 29.5?5.1 vs. 27.9?5.0 kg/m2, p=0.001, p=0.04, p<0.001) and BFM (34.5?12.7 vs. 29.6?10.2 vs. 27.1?10.8 kg, p=0.007, p=0.11, p <0.001) decreased, while eVFA did not differ across age tertiles, suggesting that older age increases central fat distribution. Compared to normal weight, overweight type 2 diabetes patients had greater triglycerides (218.8?303.4 vs. 110.9?44.9 mg/dl, p=0.01), uric acid (4.5?2.4 vs. 3.3?1.4 mg/dl, p=0.01), and lower HDL-cholesterol (43.9?12.9 vs. 54.1?15.4 mg/dl, p<0.001) serum levels, and higher prevalences of hypertension (71.8% vs. 39.4%, p=0.005) and NASH (59.1% vs. 25.0%, p=0.005).\r\nConclusion. Visceral fat accumulation is associated with older age in both types of diabetes, but only in type 2 diabetes is associated with cardiometabolic anomalies.