- Login
- Register
- Home/Current Issue
- About the journal
- Editorial board
- Online submission
- Instructions for authors
- Subscriptions
- Foundation Acta Endocrinologica
- Archive
- Contact
Romanian Academy
The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy
ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA (BUC)
The International Journal of Romanian Society of Endocrinology / Registered in 1938in Web of Science Master Journal List
Acta Endocrinologica(Bucharest) is live in PubMed Central
Journal Impact Factor - click here.
This Article
Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Acta Endocrinologica (Buc)
Reinisch A, Holzer K, Bojunga J, Bechstein WO, Habbe N
Patients’ Safety and Feasibility of Intravenous Urapidil in the Pretreatment of Pheochromocytoma Patients in a Normal Ward Setting – an Analysis of 20 Consecutive Cases
Acta Endo (Buc) 2016, 12 (4): 475-480doi: 10.4183/aeb.2016.475
Context. The intravenously administered
selective α1 antagonist urapidil represents an alternative
to phenoxybenzamine in the preoperative treatment of
pheochromocytoma patients.
Objective. The aim of the study was to investigate
the blood pressure changes in pheochromocytoma patients
with urapidil pretreatment with special regards to the need
for interventions in order to estimate the safety of this
treatment in a normal ward setting.
Design. The medical records of all patients
who underwent adrenalectomy for PCC were reviewed
retrospectively. Systolic blood pressure values >180mmHg
were defined as hypertensive episodes and systolic blood
pressure values < 50mmHg as hypotensive episodes.
Episodes of blood pressure instabilities were considered
significant and recorded as intervention if they led to a direct
action.
Results. Twenty consecutive patients who received
urapidil pretreatment were enrolled in this retrospective
study. Preoperatively, a median of 9 blood pressure
measurements per day have been performed on the ward. A
total of 2 episodes of hypertension occurred, and 1 episode
of hypotension has been recorded. In the period from 25-72
hours postoperatively the median number of blood pressure
measurements was 5 per 24 hours. The blood pressure
deviations led to a total of 3 interventions for hypertension
in 1 (5%) patients and 5 interventions for hypotension in 3
(15%) patients. All interventions could be managed on the
normal ward, without the need to transfer the patient to an
ICU.
Conclusions. Intravenous urapidil can safely be
administered on a normal ward without putting patients at
risk. Intensive monitoring beyond 24 hours postoperatively
was not necessary, the blood pressure measurements during
the shift on a normal ward were sufficient for maintaining
patients’ safety.
Keywords: Pheochromocytoma, Urapidil, Adrenalectomy, Pretreatmen, patient safety
Correspondence: Nils Habbe MD, University Hospital Frankfurt, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7,
60590, Frankfurt, Germany, E-mail: nils.habbe@kgu.de