- Login
- Register
- Home/Current Issue
- About the journal
- Editorial board
- Online submission
- Instructions for authors
- Subscriptions
- Foundation Acta Endocrinologica
- Archive
- Contact
Romanian Academy
The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy
ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA (BUC)
The International Journal of Romanian Society of Endocrinology / Registered in 1938in Web of Science Master Journal List
Acta Endocrinologica(Bucharest) is live in PubMed Central
Journal Impact Factor - click here.
Showing 1 - 1 of 1
-
Endocrine Care
Bastu E, Baysal B
The Effect of GnRH Agonist versus GnRH Antagonist on Pregnancy RateActa Endo (Buc) 2012 8(2): 249-256 doi: 10.4183/aeb.2012.249
AbstractContext. Comparison of GnRH analogues and their impact on IVF treatment to improve pregnancy outcome.\r\nObjective. To compare the effects of GnRH agonists and GnRH antagonists on pregnancy rates.\r\nDesign. A total of 458 women who had embryo transfers completed were analyzed retrospectively in a university\r\nhospital setting.\r\nMethods. Comparative data were gathered on pregnancy rates, FSH dosage, and number of follicles, retrieved oocytes\r\nand embryos.\r\nResults. The use of GnRH agonist showed a strong association with the number of follicles (GnRH antagonist: 11.45; GnRH agonist: 15.17), oocytes retrieved (GnRH antagonist: 10.66; GnRH agonist: 13.68) and embryos transferred (GnRH antagonist: 2.54; GnRH agonist: 2.89) (p<0.01). The use of GnRH antagonist showed a significant association with β-\r\nhCG > 5 mIU/mL pregnancy (GnRH antagonist 30.8%; GnRH agonist: 21.8%) (p<0.05). Ongoing pregnancy rates between\r\nthe two GnRH analogues showed no statistically significant differences (GnRH antagonist 72.1%; GnRH agonist: 64.1%)\r\n(p>0.05).\r\nConclusion. On the basis of current evidence, it is still unclear which GnRH analogue is the first choice for achieving a higher rate of pregnancy.
Showing 1 - 1 of 1