ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA (BUC)

Context. Epidemiological data have shown that obesity increases the risk of developing colorectal cancer and also an increased body mass index (BMI) is associated with a worse prognosis. Bevacizumab based systemic therapy, an antiVEGF targeted therapy, is an important treatment option for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Obesity is associated with high level of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), that might provoke resistance to antiVEGF monoclonal antibody. Objective. To evaluate the efficacy in terms of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of bevacizumab systemic therapy in patients with mCRC. Design. Retrospective cohort, single center study. Subjects and Methods. Between January 2007 and December 2012, 112 patients with mCRC, who followed bevacizumab based systemic therapy in the “Ion Chiricuta” Oncology Institute in Cluj-Napoca, were included in our analysis. Results. Values of BMI ≥ or <27 kg/sqm was found that PFS is statistically significant superior in patients with BMI<27 kg/sqm (n=77) than in those with BMI ≥ 27 kg/sqm (n=35), 24 months versus 17.9 months (p = 0.04). Five years OS was not influenced by the BMI, 35% vs 30% (p=0.29). In patients with liver metastases with values of BMI ≥ 27 kg/ sqm have PFS lower than patients with a BMI <27 kg/sqm, 17.5 months versus 24.5 months (p = 0.02). Five years OS was not influenced by the BMI, 39% (BMI <27 kg/sqm) vs. 22% (BMI ≥ 27 kg/sqm) (p = 0.09). Conclusions. This study demonstrated the negative influence of BMI on both PFS on the entire sample of patients and in patients with liver metastases only, BMI cutoff value proved to be 27 kg/square meter and shows that the BMI may be an important prognostic factor with a high clinical relevance in patients with mCRC.

Objective. Romania has no national guidelines for hypothyroidism treatment, nor are there any recommendations from national societies to adhere to international guidelines. Our aim was to identify the attitudes of Romanian physicians relating to hypothyroidism treatment focusing on available formulations of levothyroxine (LT4). Methods. All 748 members of the Romanian Society of Endocrinology were invited to participate in a web-based survey. A total of 316 (42.24%) members responded, of whom 222 (70.2%) completed all questions. Results. Half of the respondents recommended LT4 treatment in euthyroid patients, from 3.6% in euthyroid patients with obesity to 36.4% in euthyroid females with infertility associated with high levels of thyroid antibodies. LT4 was considered the preferred treatment for hypothyroidism (compared to combination treatment of LT4 with LT3 or LT3 alone) by 98.6% of respondents. LT4 in liquid solution was preferred over tablets if malabsorption is suspected (56.5% vs. 27.3%), for patients with unexplained poor biochemical control (52.5% vs. 22.9%) and for patients not able to adhere to ingesting LT4 fasted (74.0% vs. 9.8%). The most and least probable explanations for persistent symptoms in patients with hypothyroidism who achieve a normal TSH under medication were “psychosocial factors” and “burden of having to take medication”, respectively. Conclusion. A significant proportion of Romanian physicians would use LT4 in some groups of euthyroid patients, contrary to current evidence. The preferred treatment for hypothyroidism was LT4. Alternative LT4 formulations (liquid solution) are considered in specific clinical conditions. Diversification of available thyroid hormone formulations was readily incorporated into everyday practice.