- Login
- Register
- Home/Current Issue
- About the journal
- Editorial board
- Online submission
- Instructions for authors
- Subscriptions
- Foundation Acta Endocrinologica
- Archive
- Contact
Romanian Academy
The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy
ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA (BUC)
The International Journal of Romanian Society of Endocrinology / Registered in 1938in Web of Science Master Journal List
Acta Endocrinologica(Bucharest) is live in PubMed Central
Journal Impact Factor - click here.
This Article
Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Acta Endocrinologica (Buc)
Pricop C, Radavoi GD, Puia D, Vechiu C, Jinga V
Obesity: a Delicate Issue Choosing the Eswl Treatment for Patients with Kidney and Ureteral Stones?
Acta Endo (Buc) 2019, 15 (1): 133-138doi: 10.4183/aeb.2019.133
Context. Urolithiasis and obesity are now public
health problems with an increased incidence worldwide.
Management of urolithiasis in patients with morbid obesity
is usually associated with higher morbidity and mortality
compared to non-obese patients. ESWL is a nonsurgical
procedure for the treatment of lithiasis. In obese patients the
ESWL efficacy is influenced by the skin-to-stone distance or
poorer detection of the calculus because of the fatty tissue.
Objective. To highlight the overweight or obese
lithiasic patient profile that could be best treated by ESWL.
Subjects and Methods. We evaluated ESWL
results in 1393 patients with kidney or ureteral stones
between 5 and 20 mm. They were divided into 4 groups
according to the BMI: Group A-overweight (BMI=25-30 kg/
m2); Group B-grade I obesity (BMI=30-35 kg/m2); Group
C-grade II obesity (BMI=35-40 kg/m2) and a control group
of normal weight (BMI=18-25 kg/m2).
Results. Patients with a higher BMI required a
greater number of ESWL sessions. A statistically significant
greater number of patients with a waist circumference of >102
cm required more than 2 SWL sessions (p=0.007). Location
of the stones in the pelvic ureter had the highest rate of
success for obese patients (p=0.00001). The ESWL success
rate in overweight and obese patients can be negatively
influenced by BMI, abdominal circumference over 102 cm,
and hardness of calculi reflected in the radiopacity on KUB.
Conclusions. In patients with grade II obesity,
pyelocaliceal calculus and increased hardness, other
urological alternatives to lithiasis should be considered from
the beginning.
Keywords: Lithiasis, Obesity, Lithotripsy,
Lithotripter.
Correspondence: George Daniel Radavoi MD, “Prof. Dr. Th. Burghele” Clinical Hospital, Urology, 20 Panduri street, Bucharest,
District 5, 050659, Romania, E-mail: radadaniel@yahoo.com