ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA (BUC)

Background. Usually, silver stain is needed to differentiate between normal or hyperplastic hypophysis and pituitary adenomas. Many papers reported the lack of reticular fibers network as mandatory for pituitary adenoma diagnosis. \r\nAim. Differences between the architecture of reticular fibers in normal pituitary and pituitary adenomas \r\nMethods. Gordon- Sweet silver staining of pituitary specimens, prelevated during pituitary surgery performed in 138 patients with the endocrine and imagistic diagnosis of pituitary macro-adenomas. \r\nResults.Pituitary specimens of pituitary adenomas was confirmed in 133 cases; 3 specimens were with normal pituitary tissue, 1 with pituitary hyperplasia, 1 with pituitary apoplexy.Twelve of 133 pituitary adenomas specimens were associated also with normal pituitary tissue.There was a loss of acinar network of reticular fibres in 115 cases, but the present study describes the persistence of reticular fibers networks in 18 (13,53%) of 133 pituitary adenomas. We identified five distribution patterns of remanent reticular fibers network in pituitary adenomas using silver staining. \r\nIn conclusion, persistence of reticular fibers in a small number of pituitary adenomas could be a possible pitfall in the discrimination between the normal hypophysis and pituitary adenoma.

We highlight here in a human pituitary prolactinoma, by double immunohistochemistry, clusters of cells with strong reactivity for Sox2 and prolactin The colocalization was mainly distributed at the periphery of the tumor. In contrast, in the central part of the same tumor, only\r\nisolated cells expressed Sox 2 colocalised with prolactin. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first microscopic evidence of Sox2 positivity in prolactin secreting cells from human pituitary and from such type of human pituitary adenoma.

Background. Androgen receptor (AR) plays a crucial role in the homeostasis of\r\nmammary tissue. In the present study we investigated the immunohistochemical expression\r\nof AR in breast cancer and its relationships with clinico-pathological parameters of\r\nprognosis, hormone receptors status and HER2 overexpression.\r\nMethods. There were investigated 124 patients admitted with invasive breast cancer,\r\nand from these 48 had lymph node metastasis and 9 had distant metastasis. In all specimens\r\nthere were performed immunohistochemical staining for AR, estrogen receptors (ER),\r\nprogesterone receptor (PR) and HER2. Results were correlated with pathological findings\r\nand the molecular profile of the tumors.\r\nResults. The immunohistochemical expression for AR was found in 92 cases. A\r\nsignificant correlation was found between AR expression and pathological type, grade and\r\nlymph node status, but not with distant metastasis and the expression of ER, PR and HER2.\r\nAn inverse correlation was found between AR expression and triple negative breast cancers.\r\nConclusion. Our data suggest that AR is an individual factor of prognosis and is a\r\nuseful marker to stratify patients with triple negative tumors. AR could be a potential target\r\nfor specific therapy in individuals excluded from the conventional hormone therapy.